I finished Dreamhunter and the sequel to it, Dreamquake, almost two weeks ago. Let's see what I can remember. Not that I ever have anything really insightful to say.
My first impression of Dreamhunter was that it was a little hard to understand. I truly was confused at the beginning because I didn't feel like I knew what the author was talking about. I wanted a glossary of terms to explain everything that I didn't fully grasp on my own. A glossary does appear at the end of Dreamquake, so perhaps I'm not the only one who felt that way! Even so, the story was intriguing enough to keep me reading. It got easier to understand, and I thought that book 2 was even better than the first one. I definitely recommend reading Dreamquake afterwards to fully understand the storyline. (You'll want to anyway, just to see what happens!) It definitely ties up all the loose ends.
I thought the characters were really well-written. You definitely got a sense of their personalities, particularly Laura, Rose, and Chorley. Tziga and Grace seemed to me a bit more mysterious, and perhaps that was the intent, since those two are the most famous dreamhunters. And I thought "the Place" was great. Although I still sometimes wonder about dreams outside of "the Place." It's mentioned that Laura has regular dreams. Do other people as well? I'm assuming they do and that the main difference between regular dreams and those caught in "the Place" is the ability to share them. It must be similar to watching a movie only while you're asleep. So a dream palace or opera would be similar to going to a movie theater only you have a bed to sleep in, and instead of a big screen there's just another person on another bed projecting the "movie." Isn't that a compelling idea? To be able to dream something that originated with someone else? I'm sure almost everyone has had a dream that they tell other people about. What if you could show them the dream? I think that would be pretty neat. On the other hand, I've had a few that I hope no one finds out about too!
I'm not sure that there is much more I can say without spoilers, particularly for Dreamquake. So if you haven't read them, I suggest you stop here.
****Spoiler alert****
You knew that something was up when Tziga was acting so strangely and trying to make sure that Laura remembered the songs he had taught her from her a young age. So when he disappeared and she was left on her own to figure them out, I wondered if she would be able to do it. Laura is more enterprising than I initially thought, so I was a little surprised when she went to Aunt Marta for help learning the songs instead of just trying to make a small living as a dreamhunter. Her tendency to have nightmares probably discouraged that a little bit, though. After realizing how determined a person she was, I wasn't surprised when she found the note from her father and decided to actually try to follow the request he made of her.
The Sandman, Nown, is one of my favorite parts of the book. I love the idea of how he is made and how he can be changed by just a letter - take away the first N and he becomes free, OWN; take away the W and he becomes NON and stops existing. And I liked the idea of how he was tied to her family, that other versions of him had existed to help other members of her family, and how he seems to evolve with each version of himself.
As for Dreamquake, I was surprised that "the Place" was a Nown all on it's own. I was even more surprised that it was created by Laura's son, Lazarus, and that all of the dreams stemmed from him. It had been mentioned in Dreamhunter and throughout Dreamquake that the dreams seemed to be taking place in the future. But in reality, they were taking place in the past. Confusing, huh? How strange it must have been for Laura to meet her yet-to-be-born son when he was an adult and she had, in his experience, already passed away. The magic of "the Place" covered a lot of things!
I really loved the ending of the duet. I thought the author did a great job illustrating how our actions don't just affect us but have a ripple effect in so many directions. Lazarus's choices changed the way his mother's and grandfather's lives turned out (along with everyone else who lived in that world); Laura's choices changed the lives of everyone in her present and, eventually, future when she erased "the Place." We can't change what happened in the past like Lazarus does, but our choices can make a difference in our own futures and in the lives of the people around us. Laura's choice to get rid of the Place even changed Lazarus's life. I thought the ending was really well done. And, while I always had a suspicion that Sandy didn't die and was simply being help captive by Cas Doran and his henchmen, I was relieved when he did turn out to be alive and could be with Laura.
Okay, this was a much longer post than I had anticipated. Hopefully someone else will have read both books. I'd like to know what other people thought!
Friday, September 11, 2009
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
September's book assingment
Alright we're going with Carly's suggestion. We'll be reading Dreamhunter by Elizabeth Knox. It's a 2-book series. The second book is Dreamquake. They both come recommended by Stephenie Meyer, so they must be good :)
And thanks everyone for the well-wishes!
And thanks everyone for the well-wishes!
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
September book?
First of all, let me apologize for totally dropping the ball on picking a book for August. Things have been so crazy at our house, I barely have time to recognize that days are flying by on the calendar. Second, I have good news to share... yes, it's what you're all thinking... I'm pregnant! YEA! However, I have been so sick, it's been a nightmare. I haven't read anything in weeks, I'm just too sick, so I never got around to picking a book... and then I realized that August is already more that half gone. My bad.
So... anyone have any suggestions for September? I'm hoping that by the time September rolls around, I will feel well enough to start reading again and I can participate. I'm eagerly anticipating some books that will be released in September - Forest Born, Catching Fire, just to name a few, so I really need to get feeling better so I can read them :)
Put any suggestions in the comments, then we can pick one.
So... anyone have any suggestions for September? I'm hoping that by the time September rolls around, I will feel well enough to start reading again and I can participate. I'm eagerly anticipating some books that will be released in September - Forest Born, Catching Fire, just to name a few, so I really need to get feeling better so I can read them :)
Put any suggestions in the comments, then we can pick one.
Friday, July 17, 2009
The Zoo Keeper's Wife; A review by a little guy
To begin with I am Miriam and this is my first review and first time reading the book in the correct month. I love reading non-fiction, fiction, textbooks and well most things. I am glad I read this book but it took me a long 2 1/2 weeks to do it.
I don’t know if anyone else experienced this but I found the flow of the story rather choppy. I think it was a great idea to write about Antonina Zabinskis her story is amazing and her courage was everlasting, but it could have been written better. (Less choppy and jumping around to so many different people) I obviously did not like the author’s style of writing and think she did a bit too much name dropping. The people she kept bringing up in the story seemed to have some connection with fame. This annoyed me because it made it sound like the Zabinskis were only saving famous people. I know many like to hear about the rich, famous and well known in history but I like to hear the history of the little people too. I realize that these famous people did randomly pop up in the Zabinskis lives I just don’t think she needed to elaborate (for an entire chapter) on why these people they were saving were famous and well known in the world. It took away from the flow of the story and made me put the book down quite a bit. I think she should have focused more on Antonina, Jan and Rys, the book is after all named for Antonina. However I did love the research the author did.
Diane Ackerman obviously did a lot of research. You see it everywhere in the book. This made me respect her knowledge and continue reading. I loved the tidbit from Herodotus (the first historian ever) on page 81 where he was quoted about the Tarpan horses. This put the significance of the extinct horses into perspective for me. It showed me that these horses had been around for a LONG time and now they were not. This showed the connection with the high ranking Nazi who allowed the continuation of the zoo specifically because of these horses which in turn allowed the zoo to save the people. While I loved this information I think it took away from the story telling aspect. I think books should be stories. I know there is a need for reference books but they are so much easier to read and understand when told as a story.
I felt the first ¾ of the book was choppy but her last section which I like to consider her conclusion finally started to flow. Those last 80 pages go by quickly because you can see she is finally getting somewhere with the Sabinskis. I loved that she finally started to actually analyze what she was writing about Antonina. She had previously been throwing facts out there that she had read from Antonina and others. It felt like reading a textbook but she finally started to show us Antonina. A part I loved was on page 209 it said:
“…Antonina [believed] in living as joyously as possible given the circumstances, while staying Vigilante.”
I definitely saw this. She went through so much but she never stopped saving people. She risked her life so many times for others. It was amazing. After reading so many WWII stories I have never seen anyone remain so joyous and positive. I started to ponder this statement. I feel it was rather profound and the conclusion I came up with was that she was doing everything in her power to save everyone! She never held back never said no never questioned her husband’s motives. She could remain joyous with a happy conscious because she gave everything she had. She never sat back and let people die. So many sat back during this war and let others die and felt guilty about it because they knew it wasn’t right. She had no need for quilt because she gave her all. I loved that about Antonina. Some might feel it was horrible of her to feel joy and be happy during this depressing time but she earned the right to feel some joy by saving so many.
All in all I way so glad I read this book. Yes it could have been written better but this was one story that really needed to be told and read. Thanks for reading this and feel free to disagree and write about it. All thoughts on this book would be great!
Miriam
P.S there are obviously a million things to be said about this book so feel free ok! There were other things I liked and disliked but I tried to keep it small so others could write too. Oh and I previously wrote rather negative review of this book on my blog but wrote a more mild one here because reviews should be mild right?
I don’t know if anyone else experienced this but I found the flow of the story rather choppy. I think it was a great idea to write about Antonina Zabinskis her story is amazing and her courage was everlasting, but it could have been written better. (Less choppy and jumping around to so many different people) I obviously did not like the author’s style of writing and think she did a bit too much name dropping. The people she kept bringing up in the story seemed to have some connection with fame. This annoyed me because it made it sound like the Zabinskis were only saving famous people. I know many like to hear about the rich, famous and well known in history but I like to hear the history of the little people too. I realize that these famous people did randomly pop up in the Zabinskis lives I just don’t think she needed to elaborate (for an entire chapter) on why these people they were saving were famous and well known in the world. It took away from the flow of the story and made me put the book down quite a bit. I think she should have focused more on Antonina, Jan and Rys, the book is after all named for Antonina. However I did love the research the author did.
Diane Ackerman obviously did a lot of research. You see it everywhere in the book. This made me respect her knowledge and continue reading. I loved the tidbit from Herodotus (the first historian ever) on page 81 where he was quoted about the Tarpan horses. This put the significance of the extinct horses into perspective for me. It showed me that these horses had been around for a LONG time and now they were not. This showed the connection with the high ranking Nazi who allowed the continuation of the zoo specifically because of these horses which in turn allowed the zoo to save the people. While I loved this information I think it took away from the story telling aspect. I think books should be stories. I know there is a need for reference books but they are so much easier to read and understand when told as a story.
I felt the first ¾ of the book was choppy but her last section which I like to consider her conclusion finally started to flow. Those last 80 pages go by quickly because you can see she is finally getting somewhere with the Sabinskis. I loved that she finally started to actually analyze what she was writing about Antonina. She had previously been throwing facts out there that she had read from Antonina and others. It felt like reading a textbook but she finally started to show us Antonina. A part I loved was on page 209 it said:
“…Antonina [believed] in living as joyously as possible given the circumstances, while staying Vigilante.”
I definitely saw this. She went through so much but she never stopped saving people. She risked her life so many times for others. It was amazing. After reading so many WWII stories I have never seen anyone remain so joyous and positive. I started to ponder this statement. I feel it was rather profound and the conclusion I came up with was that she was doing everything in her power to save everyone! She never held back never said no never questioned her husband’s motives. She could remain joyous with a happy conscious because she gave everything she had. She never sat back and let people die. So many sat back during this war and let others die and felt guilty about it because they knew it wasn’t right. She had no need for quilt because she gave her all. I loved that about Antonina. Some might feel it was horrible of her to feel joy and be happy during this depressing time but she earned the right to feel some joy by saving so many.
All in all I way so glad I read this book. Yes it could have been written better but this was one story that really needed to be told and read. Thanks for reading this and feel free to disagree and write about it. All thoughts on this book would be great!
Miriam
P.S there are obviously a million things to be said about this book so feel free ok! There were other things I liked and disliked but I tried to keep it small so others could write too. Oh and I previously wrote rather negative review of this book on my blog but wrote a more mild one here because reviews should be mild right?
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Some recent readings...
I just stumbled upon a fun series that I thought I'd share. The series is called Percy Jackson and the Olympians. I've only read the first book (there are 5), but I really liked it. I used to love learning about mythology in school, so this was right up my alley! I know we all mentioned how we didn't like the mythology element in Ever, but this is good mythology!
In a way the series is similar to Harry Potter, in that it's a young boy who finds out he's not who he thought he was. There's a whole other world hidden in our world. I just really thought the writing was well done, funny, and clever.
Also, I read the new Shannon Hale book, The Actor and the Housewife. Did anyone else read it? I thought it was good, but different than what I was expecting. I definitily was not expecting to be sobbing through a good portion of the book! I think overall I liked it, but it probably isn't my favorite Shannon Hale book.
Otherwise I've been chugging along through The Zookeeper's Wife. I think I need to renew it again at the library come to think of it....
Oh, and I saw the new Harry Potter last night!!!!!!!!!!! I loved it! I know that's not a book, but, oh well!
So, that's all, I just had some book related thoughts I'd share! Hope you all have a great weekend!
In a way the series is similar to Harry Potter, in that it's a young boy who finds out he's not who he thought he was. There's a whole other world hidden in our world. I just really thought the writing was well done, funny, and clever.
Also, I read the new Shannon Hale book, The Actor and the Housewife. Did anyone else read it? I thought it was good, but different than what I was expecting. I definitily was not expecting to be sobbing through a good portion of the book! I think overall I liked it, but it probably isn't my favorite Shannon Hale book.
Otherwise I've been chugging along through The Zookeeper's Wife. I think I need to renew it again at the library come to think of it....
Oh, and I saw the new Harry Potter last night!!!!!!!!!!! I loved it! I know that's not a book, but, oh well!
So, that's all, I just had some book related thoughts I'd share! Hope you all have a great weekend!
Monday, July 6, 2009
Ever
Did anyone else finish reading Ever?
I was expecting to like it, since I love Ella Enchanted... and I didn't. I didn't like it. In fact, I was disappointed. I thought the characters weren't very well developed, so I found that I didn't really care that much about them. I know it's a fairy tale, but the whole love-at-first-sight thing felt very thin to me. Some parts were imaginative, but other parts I felt were just weird (the whole underworld people that turn into birds or whatever? Weird...) I know all books can't end happily ever after, but I hated the ending, how she was "sacrificed" anyways, then whisked away to live "happily-ever-after" leaving her family in mourning. I didn't like their blind devotion to Admat (or whatever his name was, sorry I don't have the book in front of me) or how she kept trying to find him, even after she became a goddess herself.
I don't know, maybe I was too harsh on the book... but I'm not a fan. Anyone else have any thoughts? Feel free to disagree with me :)
I was expecting to like it, since I love Ella Enchanted... and I didn't. I didn't like it. In fact, I was disappointed. I thought the characters weren't very well developed, so I found that I didn't really care that much about them. I know it's a fairy tale, but the whole love-at-first-sight thing felt very thin to me. Some parts were imaginative, but other parts I felt were just weird (the whole underworld people that turn into birds or whatever? Weird...) I know all books can't end happily ever after, but I hated the ending, how she was "sacrificed" anyways, then whisked away to live "happily-ever-after" leaving her family in mourning. I didn't like their blind devotion to Admat (or whatever his name was, sorry I don't have the book in front of me) or how she kept trying to find him, even after she became a goddess herself.
I don't know, maybe I was too harsh on the book... but I'm not a fan. Anyone else have any thoughts? Feel free to disagree with me :)
Friday, June 12, 2009
The Lace Reader
I finished the book a few days ago, and have been trying to think of something to say... and I know some of you have been having the same difficulty. I did like the book - I think she's a very creative story-teller. Loved how Salem had modern witches - thought that was fabulously ironic. Obviously, I didn't appreciate the language. I knew from reading a couple reviews that the ending was going to be a shocker - so I sort of prepared myself. I wasn't all that shocked to find out that Towner was Lyndley (or Lyndley was Towner... or whatever...) I think I (sort of) saw it coming (since I was waiting for something shocking). Still, I wasn't sure I really understood what happened. I think reading it through a second time would be useful, and I think I might do that, before the sequel comes out (this fall, I think I heard??)
So I went to the book's website (just like you did Carly) to see if I could find some answers... and yeah, there was nothing helpful. So I went digging around some other sights to see if others were talking about the book, and I found this site:
http://bookchatcentral.yuku.com/topic/1345/t/THE-LACE-READER-Sept-08-SPOILERS.html?page=1
I read all 3 pages of comments, and some of them were helpful in figuring what exactly happened. This comment in particular was helpful, so I'm quoting right from the website:
So again, not my thoughts - this Vanessa obviously understood the book a lot more than I did. But I agree with what she said, and think it sheds some light on the plot (since yes, it was hard to follow). Now, having read these thoughts... any insights from you guys who have read it?
So I went to the book's website (just like you did Carly) to see if I could find some answers... and yeah, there was nothing helpful. So I went digging around some other sights to see if others were talking about the book, and I found this site:
http://bookchatcentral.yuku.com/topic/1345/t/THE-LACE-READER-Sept-08-SPOILERS.html?page=1
I read all 3 pages of comments, and some of them were helpful in figuring what exactly happened. This comment in particular was helpful, so I'm quoting right from the website:
Some random reactions to comments in this thread... Re: Jack raping Towner - on one level, I saw it as Jack's final closure. He is finally forced to accept that like it or not, it is over, and he has to move on. He is very remorseful, and I don't see what he did as an act of aggression, but more of desperation, trying to make things the way they were. And, since he was drunk, he probably bought into the possibility of being able to fix things that way more than he would have in a sober state. Also, as Jill already said, I thought the chapter showed Towner's way of disassociating herself from what was happening to her - it shows us what she must have done, aside from being "Lyndley," to survive what her father was doing to her. I didn't see the chapter as unnecessary; in fact, for me, it was pivitol, because the end of that chapter was where I finally felt certain that I knew what was going on - that there was no Lyndley and that she was actually Towner. I had wondered earlier about the possibility when Jack didn't tell May that Lyndley had jumped in the water and drowned, and this clinched it for me. At the end of the chapter he says that he can't believe he raped her, especially knowing the history with Cal Boynton - which would indicate that Cal was actually abusing Towner, not Lyndley. Also, he says that he had jumped into the water trying to save Towner - again, no mention of Lyndley. I think Rafferty knew some of what was going on with Towner - like the fact that she believed her twin was alive and the suicide attempt - but I'm not sure that he knows everything. For instance, why does he say that Towner was Eva's grandniece (p. 285), when really, if Eva is Emma's mother, Eva is Towner's grandmother? Seems that Eva never filled him in on the real family tree? And wouldn't he have done the research on sexual abuse in children earlier than at the end of the story had he really known what Cal had done? Dirty family secret that nobody discussed - clearly, or he wouldn't have been so worshipped by his Calvinists. Re: Eva and having to kill herself to set Towner free: someone else mentioned that this was the only way she saw to get Towner back to Salem to deal with reality. Her note at the end says that it was the only way she could see to save Towner from her downward spiral, so she would take her place; i.e. she would die so that Towner could live, because she felt that otherwise, Towner was going to eventually completely self-destruct. Why NOW - well, she'd already attempted suicide, invented Lyndley, and at the point when Eva killed herself, was at an impasse in therapy. She wasn't getting better. She'd run from what had happened with Cal and her suicide attempt, had had therapy which included electroshock treatments and supposed memory loss, and still believed in the existence of Lyndley. She just wasn't getting better, and Eva could see that. Towner chose to be called Towner instead of Sophya as a result of her abuse. She says the way Cal says it reminds her of why she had to change it - he said it, "sibilant, snakelike. Sophya was a name that could be whispered in the night. Real quiet, so that no one else could hear it. Quiet enough so it didn't even wake my mother" (p. 371). I agree with what others say about why nobody clues Towner in - they surely saw her as very fragile. Nobody wants to tell the crazy girl that she's crazy, that her sister isn't real. In Towner's version of events, May and Eva know what Lyndley is - her way of coping with her abuse - what would happen if she was forced to look that in the face? But they do try to help her. May tries to reason with her sister Emma and gets told that she's twisted and perverted (p. 241-242). So she tries to take custody. When Eva realizes that not only is Towner being abused, but that she has "resurrected" (for lack of a better word) her twin to deal with it, she sends Towner to therapy, but it doesn't take (p. 268). She's supposed to talk about her sister, but she refuses. May's comment to Towner that she couldn't have loved her more if she'd been her own child - her final attempt to try to get through to Towner. I think that Towner knows on some level that Lyndley isn't real, that her father is really Cal, and that he did those horrible things to her - otherwise, she wouldn't have started to hyperventilate and felt the need to take her emergency pill. I think she just didn't want to accept it. It reminded me of the end of The Sixth Sense, when Bruce Willis's character finally realizes what he would have known all along if he'd been paying attention to the clues - he's dead - but he wasn't ready / didn't want to see it. As for Towner not having an emotional compass - not sure exactly what you mean, Jen. I think that in the final scenes, she's certainly getting her bearings. She has the recurring dream / vision of Cal being torn apart by dogs for what he's done to her mother and "Lyndley," and she always wants him dead in this scenario until, when it is finally happening, she considers her unborn half-sister and Angela and Cal's love for each other. In the end she doesn't allow Cal to be torn apart, although he is badly injured and deserves it considering what he's done. To me, this shows that she is coming to grips with what has happened in her life and is able to start letting it go. She doesn't forgive him, but she doesn't become a part of his brand of evil, either. This bit: "My twin sister, Lyndley, said she couldn't read lace, but I never believed her. The last time we tried, she saw the same thing I saw in the pattern, and what we saw that night led her to the choices that eventually killed her. When Lyndley died, I resolved never to look at a piece of lace again". I think this is when she saw Emma badly beaten. The "Towner" part of her wanted to go with Jack; "Lyndley" wanted to save her mother, and so she went back to her family instead. I think Towner believed that Lyndley killed herself as a result of what had happened to her mother and her (Lyndley's) continual abuse at the hands of her father after going back. Vanessa |
So again, not my thoughts - this Vanessa obviously understood the book a lot more than I did. But I agree with what she said, and think it sheds some light on the plot (since yes, it was hard to follow). Now, having read these thoughts... any insights from you guys who have read it?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)